Du Texas
Victor Considerant · 1857 · French — primary, as act
Transcription: doc/text/books/1800/considerant/french_clean.md, doc/text/books/1800/considerant/english_clean.md
TODO resolve the title/edition tangle. The Considerant folder holds THREE works: the active
_clean.md(called *Du Texas, 1857, in project memory),du_texas/(raw OCR fr/en), andeuropean_colonization_in_texas/(a separate English-language address). The 1854 recruitment pamphlet Au Texas — the one Bürkli translated into German — may be a distinct text again. Confirm which physical work the clean files transcribe and split into separate dossiers if needed (considerant-au-texas,considerant-european-colonization).
What it is
Considerant's public statement on the Texas project — the document(s) that recruited colonists and capital and defended the vision. Clean fr + en transcription COMPLETE (Part One §I–VI, Part Two §I–XII; ends "V. Considérant, San Antonio, 6 août 1857"). See du-texas-transcription.
Author's position
Founder and chief theorist of the colony. Maximum stake. Writing as participant and promoter, not observer.
Stake
Sell the project: attract emigrants and shareholders, justify the site and the plan. Later passages double as defense as difficulties mount. The persuasion is itself data about what the colony was claimed to be.
Access
First-hand on the vision, the site selection (Considerant traveled to Texas), and the plan. Not a reliable witness to operational reality on the ground — that is what Savardan and Bürkli supply, often against him.
Known distortions / how to weight
- Read as advocacy: site virtues, prospects, and capital are presented to persuade. Cross-check material claims (acreage, soil, railroad corridor) against the SCEAT statutes, the map, and the deed record.
- A baseline for what the standard narrative measures the colony against — the promise the "impractical dreamers" story says was broken.
Cross-references
[[burkli]] (translated Considerant's recruitment pamphlet, then turned against the management), [[savardan]] (on-the-ground counterweight), [[sceat-statutes]] (the legal structure behind the promise).
Timeline extraction
Du Texas timeline — events extracted from Considérant's apologia
Source: Victor Considérant, Du Texas — Premier rapport à mes amis (Paris/Brussels, 1857). Clean EN at doc/text/books/1800/considerant/english_clean.md (Part One §I–VI, Part Two §I onward; signed "San Antonio, 6 août 1857"); FR at french_clean.md. Locators: [DT I.§] = Part/section. Dossier: src/sources/considerant-du-texas/dossier.md. The claim-by-claim map against Savardan is src/sources/considerant_savardan_correspondence.md.
Why this source matters: This is the founder's own account — the one voice the spine otherwise has only at second hand. It is not a chronicle but an apologia: a post-collapse report to the shareholders, written after Considérant's physical and mental breakdown, arguing that the plan was never wrong, the colonists broke it by coming too soon, the climate is magnificent, Cousin was a providential savior, and the affairs are now "resurrected." So its value to the timeline is not new dates (it has very few) but Considérant's version of the disputed events — the founder's side of the project's central Rashomon node. For most of the spine's 1855–57 entries where Savardan leads, this source is the counter-witness / foil: record what Considérant says happened and how he frames it, and the divergence is the finding.
Caution on stratum: primary-as-act, but maximally motivated — never settle a material fact on it alone (REGISTER). It is deliberately vague on dates and names ("circumstances, not persons"); the passive voice ("the funds were swallowed up") is itself the rhetorical move Savardan sets out to break. Use it for the founder's framing and for the handful of events only he narrates from the inside.
Dated events (the apologia's thin chronology)
Dates are mostly seasonal and inferred from Considérant's own narration; treat as his framing, not independent fixes.
1853.summer - Considérant's reconnaissance: he sees the "great vacant spaces between
the Brazos and the Trinity," Belton as "a few wretched shanties," Fort
Worth's buildings + gardens [DT I.II, II.VII]
1854.?? - at Antwerp, before sailing, he reads a written instruction to the Louvain
bachelors disclaiming any Society engagement with them, and hands it to
Cousin (whom he urges to embark with them) [DT I.III]
1854.late - embarks at Ostend for the second voyage [DT VIII] — already "crushed
before I had so much as set foot again in Texas"
1854/55.?? - arrives New York; learns of the law of the Reserve, the Pacific-railroad
land reservation, the Peters Company appropriations — "things of which I
had not been informed in Europe"; writes the hasty NY pamphlet
(*European Colonization in Texas*) [DT I.II]
1855.?? - from New York he sees "a body of nearly TWO HUNDRED colonists" already
arrived or en route — "my plan was broken in my hand!" — and sinks into
despair, warding off "an immediate physical end" with morphine [DT I.III]
1855.spring/summer - reaches Texas; adopts "the settlement" of the ruinous situation
(the least-bad of the courses he weighs), explained to the population
"without gilding it with hopes I did not share" [DT I.IV, II.IX]
1855.?? - the **Mique episode**: a forewarned colonist (twice told to wait) arrives
ill and broke; Considérant turns him away on the spot ("Not an hour…
you will not stay here") — offered as proof of his new firmness [DT II.IX]
1855.autumn - first cold restores him; he sets out for Austin (to attempt a land grant
before the opening legislature), then pushes west into the SW; "absence
of five months" [DT I.V, II.VII]
1855–56.winter - the brutal winter he CONFIRMS: Northers "almost without interruption
for six weeks," thermometer to −15°/−16° — "no such winter in memory"
[DT II.VII]
1856.?? - back in Dallas County after the 5-month absence; writes out "the plan of
all the necessary reforms," asks Paris for a director, hands the interim
to "an honest man" (Duthoya), and forms his "irrevocable resolution no
longer to meddle… to be buried at least elsewhere" — then leaves again
[DT I.V] ← this is the founder's framing of what Savardan dates as the
8 July 1856 FLIGHT (see Reconciliation)
1856.?? - the Reserve is "lifted unanimously" (after both chambers had repeatedly
refused); the located lands mostly survive; the railroad, long stalled,
revives — the "strokes of fate" [DT II.II]
1856–57.?? - the "resurrection": Cousin, "by fate… on the spot," closes the abyss and
sets the liquidation going; for "two months past" Considérant counts
himself recovered [DT I, II.I]
1857.?? - in "a year truly disastrous for the country" he shows the recovery plan to
five persons — Bureau, Malibert, Willemin, and Mme Considérant [DT II.IV n1]
1857.08.06 - the report is signed "San Antonio, 6 août 1857" (written there across the
summer — "the first days of August," 29½° latitude) [DT close]
Specific items — the apologia's theses (the foil)
What Du Texas argues, theme by theme — the founder's framing each spine entry should carry as the counter-reading (full claim/counter-claim in the correspondence doc):
- Responsibility. Funds "swallowed up before my eyes," against his will, in operations "formally contradictory to" his plan [DT I.I]. Passive voice throughout; "I have not accused persons… the harm came, above all, from circumstances" [DT I.VI].
- Cause of failure = premature emigration. The ~200 who rushed over "broke my plan in my hand" [DT I.III]; the only intrinsically better course "would have been to send back to Europe… nine-tenths of the persons" [DT I.IV].
- The plan was never wrong. After 2½ years he has "not one modification, not a single one, to make to this plan" [DT II.VIII]; success was attached "to a determinate plan," never "to my personality" [DT II.VIII].
- The country is magnificent. "I have… nothing to retract" on climate/fertility/ water; "with water one can do anything," and on rain alone "one can still do much" [DT II.VII]. He concedes the bad winter + drought + locusts but as "an imperceptible shadow."
- Land grants reframed. He "desisted" from the Texas land grant and now holds "it is better, for a Company, to buy its own [lands] than to receive them gratis" [DT II.VII].
- Cousin = providential savior. "The only man who could conjure away the final disaster"; "in saving your affairs, [he] saved for me much more than life" [DT II.I].
- The recovery is real. Fate turned; the affairs are "resurrected"; the two directors' opinion is that "normal liquidation will there recover everything and… perhaps yield a profit" [DT II.VI].
- The new policy — two categories. Henceforth the Company is "irresponsible outside its Statutes"; anyone arriving without a signed paper is "treated as a stranger… as an intruder," left to sleep on the prairie even unto death [DT II.IX]. The hardening the Mique anecdote is meant to license.
Reconciliation with TIMELINE.md
Witness key for this source: considerant-du-texas (already in the Conventions key-list; until now cited only as a corroborator at 1855.04.12). Stratum: primary-as-act, the founder's apologia. It rarely leads a date — its role is the counter-framing on entries Savardan leads.
- 1856.07.08 Considérant's flight — supplies the FOUNDER'S framing. The spine leads with
‹savardan›(disappears at dawn the day fixed to pay the reserved parts). Du Texas reframes the same withdrawal as a principled, illness-driven retreat — "an irrevocable resolution no longer to meddle… to be buried at least elsewhere" [DT I.V] — and gives no date and no mention of the payment due. Addconsiderant-du-texas✗to that entry: same act, opposite valence (flight vs. principled withdrawal). The divergence IS the finding. - 1855 premature emigration — Du Texas is the SOURCE of the "they broke my plan" thesis that
findings.mdrebuts. The spine's arrival entries (1855.05.03 / 07.17) should cross-reference this: Considérant blames the ~200 [DT I.III], but the Nuremberg cohort was his own pre-approved list (savardan N IV; correspondence doc). - 1856.09.01 Texas incorporation / land grant — Du Texas reframes the defeat. The spine has the grant refused and only incorporation won; Du Texas recasts the refusal as a preference ("better to buy than receive gratis") [DT II.VII] — which Au Texas had budgeted at ~400,000 fr (savardan N XI). Add as the founder's spin on that entry.
- 1857.02–04 Cousin liquidation — Du Texas is the SAVIOR account. The spine leads with
‹savardan›(Cousin the executioner, usurious sales). Du Texas [DT II.I] is the exact inversion — Cousin the providential rescuer. Addconsiderant-du-texasas the opposite-valence witness; this is the Rashomon node at its sharpest. - Winter 1855–56 cold — CORROBORATES. Du Texas independently confirms the brutal winter (Northers six weeks, −15°/−16°) [DT II.VII] — supporting the cold-winter thread the spine carries at Bureau's 1857.01.17 arrival and that santerre mis-seasons to "May 1856." A rare point where the founder and his critics agree on a fact.
- NEW candidate entries:
- 1857.08.06 — Du Texas signed at San Antonio (the apologia itself as a dated act; the report that the whole correspondence/Rashomon node hangs on). Spine candidate, led by
‹considerant-du-texas›. - The Mique episode (1855) — a forewarned colonist turned away ill; offered by Considérant as virtue [DT II.IX], corrected by Savardan as cruelty-as-policy (N VII). Better as a Life-events / illustrative entry than a spine date; flag the two readings.
- No independent dates to add for 1858+ — Du Texas predates the dissolution's aftermath; it ends at the "resurrection" Savardan flatly contradicts. Its forward horizon ("all goes well") is itself a finding against the receivership the spine records at 1858.